Comparisons

Choose the right memory layer for your agent.

pumaDB is intentionally small: hosted JSON tables, MCP tools, REST, and recovery. These comparisons show where that lightweight shape fits against larger retrieval and knowledge systems.

Available

Current comparison pages.

pumaDB vs Mem0

Memory storage, or memory intelligence?

Choose pumaDB when you want explicit durable JSON records an agent or app can inspect and update. Choose Mem0 when you want semantic recall, memory extraction, and personalization over conversations.

Read comparison

pumaDB vs Zep

Explicit JSON memory, or governed context graphs?

Choose pumaDB when an agent or app needs simple explicit state it can inspect, update, and restore. Choose Zep when a production agent needs graph-built context from chat history, business data, user behavior, and changing facts.

Read comparison

pumaDB vs GBrain

Small durable JSON memory, or a full agent brain?

Choose pumaDB when you want a small hosted memory primitive that an app or agent can start using immediately. Choose GBrain when you want to run and operate a richer personal or company knowledge system.

Read comparison

pumaDB vs Supabase

Agent memory without a backend project.

Choose pumaDB when Supabase is more database than the job needs. Choose Supabase when you are building the application backend itself.

Read comparison

pumaDB vs Obsidian

Memory for agents, notes for humans.

Choose pumaDB when an agent needs memory it can call directly. Choose Obsidian when a person needs a thinking space for private Markdown notes.

Read comparison

pumaDB vs Notion

Memory for agents, workspace for teams.

Choose pumaDB when an agent needs a small memory store it can call directly. Choose Notion when people need a shared workspace for organizing work.

Read comparison

Start small

Add hosted memory without standing up a database.

Connect pumaDB over hosted MCP, or call the REST API from trusted server-side code.

Install pumaDB Read the API docs